• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

The KY Sports Guys

Sports, Pop Culture, and More (99.1 The Hoss Wednesdays at 5)

March 21, 2018 by TheKYSportsGuys

On Style

By: Coachjhurt

 

Recently I have been yelling at the top of my lungs that it wasn’t UVA’s “style” that doomed it to be the 1st 1 seed ever to lose to a 16.  It is an unpopular opinion. From that stance I began to wonder what people even mean by style and if in fact anyone left in major college hoops has one that is really all that different from anybody else’s.

Combine that question with my already formed hypothesis that the shot clock homogenizes the game, and I was left yearning for actual numbers.  So I found some.

 

The Counterintuitive Truth about The Shot Clock

 

First, the theory has it that UVA plays so slow that it is its own unique style of play and that this style of play cannot prevail in the NCAA tournament.  Well, let’s see if the numbers bear this out.

On the surface, it is undeniable that UVA has under performed its regular season in the NCAA tournament. It has turned high seeds into very little having advanced to two Sweet Sixteens and one Elite Eight in the Tony Bennett era.

But is that the whole story?

First, Bennett took over a program that was 10-18 the year before he arrived. This was no blue blood for sure. Perusing UVA history one finds spots of success sandwiched by mostly mediocrity. Second, one doesn’t have to look far (Coach K, Dean Smith, John Wooden) to find coaches who also failed to have immediate tournament success.

But past basic anecdote, does UVA play a significantly different style than most, and does that style preclude them from tournament success?

Let’s start with PPG.  This year the leader in PPG was Villanova at 87. Lowest was around 60. UVA was toward the bottom at around 67 a night.  Statistically does UVA play slower than most? Yes.  But simply glancing back around 20 years one will find these disparities were much greater.  In the 1997-1998 year TCU led the nation in scoring at 97 PPG. The lowest number was around  56.  So, in the 30 second shot clock era, the lowest PPG team is about 4 points higher than it was 20 years ago.  But the highest is 10 points less.  The variation has shrunk from 41 PPG to 27.

Past PPG, let’s look at possessions per game.  In this UVA was dead last out of 351 teams with 62.1 possessions per game.  So perhaps running teams were in fact more successful in this year’s tournament. Except they weren’t.

The fastest paced team left in the field is Leonard Hamilton’s FSU squad.  They ranked 36th with 74.9 possessions. No one else left in the field cracked the top 100.  Duke was 102nd at 72.9 possessions.Texas Tech ranked 223rd with 70.4 possessions. They begin a list of 7 out of the Sweet Sixteen who ranked well toward the bottom.  The slowest paced team left? Loyola-Chicago who finished 340th with 66.6 possessions.

Here is the complete list: (from teamrankings.com)

FSU                             36                               74.9

Duke                           102                             72.9

Nevada                        113                             72.7

Texas A&M                130                             72.4

Villanova                    131                              72.4

Gonzaga                      138                             72.3

West Virginia             142                             72.2

Kansas                          168                            71.6

UK                                 170                             71.6

Texas Tech                   223                            70.4

Purdue                          253                             69.8

Clemson                        275                               69.3

Kansas St.                      318                             68.2

Michigan                        331                            67.3

Syracuse                         336                            67.0

Loyola-Chicago             340                           66.6

 

Two things that strike me:

  1. Playing fast compared to the rest of NCAA seems to be a worse style than playing slow.  Only 1 of the top 100 teams based on possessions is still alive. Meanwhile a number of teams who play about as slow as Virginia are still alive.
  2. Nobody really plays all that faster or slower than anybody else.  Teams used to, but with a 30 second clock, not anymore.  Look at the range even from FSU to Loyola.  We are talking about 8 possessions per game. 8. That includes everybody ranked 36th through 340th in the DI.

So, we can guess from this that UVA’s style is likely not the problem.  First, UVA hasn’t been in the tournament enough times to dismiss small sample size. Second, slower paced teams seem to be doing just fine and statistically better than faster paced teams. (Villanova, Duke etc. don’t necessarily play faster, but rather are more skilled and execute better. i.e, they are more efficient.) Third, Nobody really plays all that differently from anyone else.  And as we continue to shrink the shot clock, that loss of style will continue.  We will have went from a league that was more Baskin-Robbins to one that is one size fits all.

Anecdotally, CBB used to be the place for different styles the way CFB still is.  In a college football game we may watch one team trying to get a ton of snaps versus one who wants to milk the play clock. We may see someone run the spread versus someone running the wishbone. In CBB we used to have Pete Carrill and also Paul Westphal or Billy Tubbs.  We had Dean Smith winning with 4 corners and Nolan winning with 40 minutes of hell. Those were styles. Real ones.

Today we have most everyone playing man in the half and most everyone running NBA ball screen actions from various locations with occasional transition opportunities mixed in.  This is true of Kentucky, Villanova, Duke and even UVA.  The last of the Mohicans is likely residing in upstate New York.  His team plays zone and plays slow. And they are still playing.

But past that, any talk of different styles is mostly myth.  Like the dinosaur, they don’t exist anymore.

Filed Under: Josh's Posts Tagged With: NCAA basketball, style, Tony Bennett, UVA

Primary Sidebar

Coach JHurt and Stocktony

 

Our Latest Post

Harper’s Grocery

June 7, 2022 By TheKYSportsGuys

By: Coachjhurt This weekend was a difficult one. Our family lost two great women. The best of us were laid to rest on Saturday and then again on Sunday. Joyce Harper and Sharon”Fuzzy” McMurtrey passed within hours of each other, and they leave behind quite the legacy. Both had the difficult task of baby-sitting me […]

KY181: Oh, Boy Records' newest artist and one of Stocktony's personal favorites, Arlo McKinley calls in ant talks music, getting inspiration from Tyler Childers, Cincy sports and chili, and much more. 

Listen to "KY181" on Spreaker.

KY160: We were thrilled to spend most of the show talking with M*A*S*H* star Loretta Swit.A complete honor. An actors of famous actor parents Castoff.

Listen to "KY160" on Spreaker.

Our third original song. This Coach JHurt classic reminds us that the greats have written all the best lines. Check out "All the Best Lines Are Taken." Then check out all of the KYGUYS originals on YOUTUBE.

 

 

Coach JHurt & Stocktony

COACH JHURT & STOCKTONY

 

Categories

 

Links To Stuff We Like:

https://www.kytastebuds.com/

Ghurt Condo Hilton Head

The Homers Radio Network

Dan LeBatard Show

The Bottom Line KY

 

Copyright © 2022 · Hello! Pro 3 on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT